Peter Dimov wrote:
When there is one and only one strict weak ordering (equality) for a
type, not using operator and operator== because some users might have
different expectations is misguided. It is pretty clear what setvariant
or
find(first, last, v) is supposed to do; variant_less or
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
David Abrahams wrote:
But, IIUC, if operator is not provided, you'd oppose a std::less
specialization, right?
Right. When there is one and only one strict weak ordering (equality) for
a
type, not using operator and operator== because some users might
