"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Do you mean there will be two libraries/layers ?
>
> I suggest for you take a look at some other posts in
> this thread on the library layers. Let me know if you
> cann't fine them.
>
Thanks. I'm already tracking this
>From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user syntax is
> not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
It's also possible to do the signal/slot without macros on wxWindows. See
here (http://www.wxwindows.org/hworld2
[2003-08-03] Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
>WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user syntax is
>not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
Yes, and no. You can use the macros if you like that sort of stuff. But the
signal/slot mecahnism is just as easilly avai
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
[...]
> Here is interesting review of five GUI toolkits, including wxWindows:
> http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/928/
For the Qt toolkit, they kinda forgot to mention that they work in parallel
with the KDE project (http://kde.org) so they have a huge open source
suppor
"Terje Slettebø" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Make no mistake - this is a lot of work, too. However, it may be much less
> work than creating one from scratch. What do we want - vaporware of a
Boost
> GUI library coming "real soon now", perhaps not appearing for ma
At 05:52 AM 8/2/2003, E. Gladyshev wrote:
>
>--- Bohdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > but which approach is better for GUI lib.
>
>I believe that I've made a strong case for ImplTraits
>for GUI library. In the win32 case, the compilation
>
--- Bohdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > but which approach is better for GUI lib.
I believe that I've made a strong case for ImplTraits
for GUI library. In the win32 case, the compilation
time penalties would be of the same order as inclu
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --- Edward Diener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > E. Gladyshev wrote:
>
> > The pImpl technique is an idiom for hiding the
> > private methods and data
> > members of a class from the view of the user of that
> > class.
