"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Curiosity got the better of me, and I did an experimental run on build
> 2292.
>
> Looks pretty good. A vast improvement over prior releases. Problems
noted:
>
>* Missing overloads for long long.
"Gennadiy Rozental" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> bjam is reporting:
>>
>> don't know how to make result_report_test.pattern
>> don't know how to make errors_handling_test.pattern
>>
>> So it looks like something is wrong with your Jamfile.
>
> I followed Dave A. recommendation and placed
> >test_fp_comparisons IS failing on all compilers for now. It shows some
> >problems with comparison alsorithm. I will take a closer look after
> >release.
>
> Maybe you could take a quick look sooner? We aren't going to branch for
> release until Monday, and the release won't happen for some t
> bjam is reporting:
>
> don't know how to make result_report_test.pattern
> don't know how to make errors_handling_test.pattern
>
> So it looks like something is wrong with your Jamfile.
I followed Dave A. recommendation and placed them in input section of run
rule.
The above tests expec