[boost] Re: Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread Gennadiy Rozental
> bjam is reporting: > > don't know how to make result_report_test.pattern > don't know how to make errors_handling_test.pattern > > So it looks like something is wrong with your Jamfile. I followed Dave A. recommendation and placed them in input section of run rule. The above tests expec

[boost] Re: Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread Gennadiy Rozental
> >test_fp_comparisons IS failing on all compilers for now. It shows some > >problems with comparison alsorithm. I will take a closer look after > >release. > > Maybe you could take a quick look sooner? We aren't going to branch for > release until Monday, and the release won't happen for some t

[boost] Re: Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-17 Thread Carl Daniel
"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Curiosity got the better of me, and I did an experimental run on build > 2292. > > Looks pretty good. A vast improvement over prior releases. Problems noted: > >* Missing overloads for long long.

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread David Abrahams
"Gennadiy Rozental" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> bjam is reporting: >> >> don't know how to make result_report_test.pattern >> don't know how to make errors_handling_test.pattern >> >> So it looks like something is wrong with your Jamfile. > > I followed Dave A. recommendation and placed