William E. Kempf wrote: > Michael Glassford said: >> Scott McCaskill wrote: >>> I was just looking at the win32 implementation of the >>> condition variable class in the thread library and >>> noticed something odd. In version 1.7 of >>> condition.cpp, there is a bug fix for >>> condition::notify_one. At the beginning of the >>> function, a mutex is acquired, but not all control >>> paths resulted in the mutex being released. Part of >>> the fix involved making sure that the mutex is always >>> released. >>> >>> However, it looks like the same behavior still exists >>> in the current version of condition.cpp for notify_all >>> (win32)--not all control paths will release the mutex. >>> Am I mistaken, or is this a bug? >> >> It looks the same to me. Any comment about this? > > I somehow missed the original post here. Now fixed in CVS.
Thanks for looking into it, Mike _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
