"Paul A. Bristow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Thanks but this still leaves me feeling that there is a need for a
| 'Standard and Portable' way of indicating 'missing value',
sorry if I sounded negative, that wasn't the intent. I would to make
sure we all undertsand and agree on what is going
EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gabriel Dos Reis
| Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:46 PM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Re: is_nan - how to flag missing values?
|
|
| "Paul A. Bristow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | | Signalling NaNs are used to indicate miss
"Paul A. Bristow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| | Signalling NaNs are used to indicate missing initialization values.
|
| This is OK for catching missing initialization by mistake - but not
| for OK for deliberately missing because there really is no value
| (measurement missing).
There is not
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gabriel Dos Reis
| Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 9:22 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Re: is_nan
|
|
| "Paul A. Bristow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| | There is also a single IEEE FP
