Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> padding 100%, but which will be quite easy to use is this:
>
> template
> struct aligned_storage
> {
> void const* address() const ;
> void* address();
>
> // If tag_t fits in the padding, it is allocated there,
> // else it is allocated separately (but i
Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David B. Held wrote:
> > "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [...]
> >> I think I like this enhanced version.
> >> 'max_size_type_that_fit_in_padding'
> >> must better
"Gennadiy Rozental" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In fact, it might be tempting to use the other bits as well.
> > For example, I'd imagine a variant implementation that uses
> > 8 bits to flag the currently active type. I imagine this interface:
> >
> >
Gennadiy Rozental <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact it might be tempting to use all of them available:
Yes. optional<> might not need it, but I guess variant<> could use them.
BTW, is there a redist archive for variant<>? I'd like to test it, but I
found an old link to a version which is not
