Re: [boost] Re: Re: smart_assert - update; SMART_ENFORCE works

2003-08-08 Thread John Torjo
Hi Michael, Sorry for the late reply... > > A postcondition such as I'm suggesting would perform an assertion when a > function (or the enclosing block) exits instead of on the line where the > assertion was defined. Obviously, if a function only has one exit path, it > would be simple just to pu

[boost] Re: Re: smart_assert - update; SMART_ENFORCE works

2003-08-04 Thread Michael Glassford
John Torjo wrote: > Hi Michael, > >> >> 1) How is this going? >> > > Unfortunately, I've been EXTREMELY busy these days :( > > It's almost done - I've worked on making a small footprint of > SMART_ASSERT (when using SMART_ASSERT, the generated code should be > as small as possible) > > Note: try th