[boost] Re: SocketSetConcept(fd_set wrapper)

2002-11-25 Thread Hu Xinwei
hi boosters: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostSocket/SocketSetConcept Can we use std::set like method names... remove - erase add - insert is_set - count (I'm not fussed about this one) Wrap fd_set is interesting, but I don't think it is necessary. IMHO,

[boost] Re: SocketSetConcept (fd_set wrapper)

2002-11-24 Thread Hugo Duncan
Hamish, On 24 Nov 2002 19:01:01 +, Hamish Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostSocket/SocketSetConcept Can we use std::set like method names... remove - erase add - insert Sure. is_set - count (I'm not fussed about

Re: [boost] Re: SocketSetConcept (fd_set wrapper)

2002-11-24 Thread Hamish Mackenzie
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 21:22, Hugo Duncan wrote: is_set - count (I'm not fussed about this one) Not sure about count, how about something like active Yes, or contains? Also for library implementors I think we need update_width() To be called after the OS has updated the fd_set I saw

RE: [boost] Re: SocketSetConcept (fd_set wrapper)

2002-11-24 Thread Jeff Garland
I think ACE is an almost perfect model for what we want. The main I agree there are many good things about ACE. things I would like to see done differently in boost are 1) Use namespaces. 2) Support exception handling. 3) Use std containers. 3) Use other boost libraries. Yes and: 5)