> -Original Message-
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2003 12:57
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > As already established, fundamentally the problem stems from broken
> > implementations
>
> Who established that, and how?
You did. Or have I jumped
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As already established, fundamentally the problem stems from broken
> implementations
Who established that, and how?
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 September 2003 19:54
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Bjarne Stroustrup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: 03 September 2003 16:57
> >>
> >> There wasn't much experience with exceptions at the tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 02 September 2003 18:46
>> >
>> > /2/ Instead of guessing we can ask him. He is amazingly
>> tolerant of idiot
>> > questions. :)
>>
>> Go for it ;-)
>
> Done: here is what he has
> -Original Message-
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 September 2003 18:46
> >
> > /2/ Instead of guessing we can ask him. He is amazingly
> tolerant of idiot
> > questions. :)
>
> Go for it ;-)
Done: here is what he has to say (with my summary of the discuss
"Iain K. Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But is this a good design? It certainly isn't the only possible one.
>> (Making all the code depend upon the definitions of both Network_err and
>> File_system_err - which no doubt drags other stuff into the translation unit
>> - isn't a design choi
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Alan, did you read
> > http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1781628
> > ??
>
> I have, but (leaving aside the argument from authority) the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Alan, did you read
>> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1781628
>> ??
>
> I have, but (leaving aside the argument from authority) the example is too
> sketchy convinci
> -Original Message-
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alan, did you read
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1781628
> ??
I have, but (leaving aside the argument from authority) the example is too
sketchy convincing.
I don't see how any individual er
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've recently been discussing the guideline recently added to the exceptions
> policy page with Dave Abrahams and he has asked me to post my views here.
>
> There is a seductive form of arguement that I've seen repeatedly lead
> projects into trouble which has made me
10 matches
Mail list logo
