On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 8:20 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one
popular version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an
important compiler to support anyway.
I will in line with the
Daryle Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's a very nice way to avoid extra work for Boost library
developers which they shouldn't have to do in the first place, but
since RedHat isn't actually going to do anything for users, leaves
them in the cold.
I don't think we support beta versions
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:20, David Abrahams wrote:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one popular
version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an important
compiler to support anyway.
I will in line with the
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
the supplier of the compiler (i.e. redhat).
I am noticing a theme in
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed
for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to
the supplier of the compiler
] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: boost::format on gcc2.96?
Jarl Friis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one
popular version of Linux, which makes it (in many
David Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops,
I was about to suggest that Boost skip support for both GCC, Intel and
VC++ entirely, and mainly focus on the Borland compiler running on
Windows 98. I had better withdraw that suggestion then...
/David
g
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
Gavin Doughtie a écrit :
I've been struggling to get boost::format to work on gcc 2.96 and
having some awful compile issues. I can't use STL port since I need to
link with libraries built against the standard GCC stl. Is there a
compatibility flag or something I can set to make this work? A
