Re: [boost] Re: function redesign for dynamic_any

2002-11-11 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Monday 11 November 2002 11:45 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote: > This functionality can be usefull but not quite often. I think it's better > to keep 'call' member function for simple use and introduce different name > (call_ex?) for advanced use. So, you can use one of: > > // 1) > template >

[boost] Re: function redesign for dynamic_any

2002-11-11 Thread Alexander Nasonov
Douglas Gregor wrote: > On Monday 11 November 2002 08:32 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote: >> Additionally, two types of control are desired: >> 1) Control over real types of arguments. It is a limitation of >> dynamic_any library that arguments must be converted to _one_ type before >> a call. But the