[boost] Re: lexical_cast segfault

2003-08-14 Thread David Abrahams
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > you missed the point, it runs completely correctly on my system I knew that. You missed my point; I was saying that there's a way to force WinXP to complain about segfaults. > I don't need to "work around" anything, nor does boost. > IMO, th

[boost] Re: lexical_cast segfault

2003-08-14 Thread Stephan T. Lavavej
[Victor A. Wagner, Jr.] > you missed the point, it runs completely correctly on my system > I don't need to "work around" anything, nor does boost. > IMO, the problem has been fixed I still observe the crash on Red Hat 9, gcc 3.3, Boost CVS. The problem has not been "fixed". Boost may be ticklin

[boost] Re: lexical_cast segfault

2003-08-14 Thread David Abrahams
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Test case (note that WinXP doesn't complain when programs segfault, hence >>the Begin/End business): See http://www.boost.org/more/error_handling.html for a way to work around that. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

Re: [boost] Re: lexical_cast segfault

2003-08-06 Thread Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
you missed the point, it runs completely correctly on my system I don't need to "work around" anything, nor does boost. IMO, the problem has been fixed At Wednesday 2003-08-06 05:12, you wrote: "Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Test case (note that WinXP doesn't complain when p