Jens Maurer wrote:
> > BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE is documented to relate to C names,
> > but swap is a C++ name so I don't think such macro
> > should be used here.
>
> The CVS change of optional.hpp:1.10 is definitely incorrect,
> because STDC_NAMESPACE refers to C names, not C++ names.
> Sorry.
>
>
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Recently, Jens Maurer changed the guard at function scope
> from:
>
> #ifndef __GNUC__
> to
> #ifndef BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE
>
> and honestly, I didn't looked much at it as I should.
>
> BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE is documented to relate to C names,
> but swap is a C++ n
David Abrahams wrote:
NOTICE:
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
Not new: there are still some regressions for Linux:
crc_test regresses for gcc3.1 and gcc3.2.3
config_test regresses for intel 7.1
> NOTICE:
>
> If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
> going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
Then be aware that I've just merged a few select config changes into the
RC_1_30_0 branch to fix the linux regressions you reported (and bring a few
NOTICE:
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boo
