Kirill wrote:
>Given that boost.random does not have an active maintainer, who could
take
>a look into this?
There has been some private discussion going on in the background.
Hopefully there will be an announcement within a day or two.
In the meantime, keep posting any fixes here - they are d
Lapshin, Kirill wrote:
>I don't have time at the moment, will look into it tonight. I will try to
>fix all the tests and submit patches to the list.
Please find attached patch which makes random compile and pass random_test
on msvc6.
It fixes random_demo and random_speed as well. Nondetermenistic
Dawes, Beman wrote:
>>Defining this macro prior to including any boost headers solves the
>>problem ...
>In my local working copy, I added:
># define BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS
>to visualc.hpp.
>While that changed the error messages somewhat, random_demo and random_test
>are still
At 05:47 PM 3/24/2003, Lapshin, Kirill wrote:
>>> The interesting part that it fails to compile even when there is no
>>> instantiation of the template.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In random library this assertion is within #ifndef
>>> BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS #endif directives.
>
>>That makes n
"Lapshin, Kirill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The interesting part that it fails to compile even when there is no
>>> instantiation of the template.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In random library this assertion is within #ifndef
>>> BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS #endif directives.
>
>>That makes
>> The interesting part that it fails to compile even when there is no
>> instantiation of the template.
>>
>>
>>
>> In random library this assertion is within #ifndef
>> BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS #endif directives.
>That makes no sense. That macro is defined for msvc6 IIRC.
No it
"Lapshin, Kirill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The interesting part that it fails to compile even when there is no
> instantiation of the template.
>
>
>
> In random library this assertion is within #ifndef
> BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS #endif directives.
That makes no sense. That
Hi All,
I was reporting recently that random does not compile on msvc
6; I've seen another report on the list that it does not work on intel c
7 as well.
The fact that released random library fails to work on these
very popular compilers is rather sad. I did some investigation and nail
