Re: [boost] Adding a generic list manipulator

2003-04-17 Thread Terje Slettebø
Another suggestion, which was also suggested, and done, for my composite stream operators (which is similar to your library), is to put it in the Sandbox. That enables easier use and updating, and you don't have to attach a file for each update. People using the Sandbox can just add it to their in

Re: [boost] Adding a generic list manipulator

2003-04-17 Thread Reece Dunn
[documentation]: William E. Kempf wrote: > NOTE: I am thinking about writing an XSLT file that will generate > boost-style documentation. Already done. You're reinventing the wheel, and should instead be helping out the development efforts of BoostBook. I said that I was *thinking* about it. A

Re: [boost] Adding a generic list manipulator

2003-04-04 Thread Reece Dunn
Paul A. Bristow wrote: Thanks for repackaging the code inside zip, and for mor examples, and making it work 'strictly' MXVC 7.0 Level 4 & NO language extensions No problem. But handling at least 2D and 3D C arrays is still acommon requirement. The problem with 2 or more dimensions is that you can

RE: [boost] Adding a generic list manipulator

2003-03-19 Thread Paul A. Bristow
This is quite neat, and works for me using MSVC 7.0 but: 1 The layout is screwed up by the mail attachment process and requires some editing to avoid compile errors. 2 The filename formatlist.hpp might be better? 3 Requires language extensions enabled. Compiling... testFomatList.cpp testFomat