But seriously I'm willing to add it, but I don't think I've heard
a compelling use case yet...
I wrote a date formatting function. This function can take a datetime,
date, or time duration, and format it to text. The core however, is
implemented using datetime_t. The function
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
However, to implement format General Date (format letter c), I
need to know if the given input contains a date, a time, or a
datetime. Since the functions pretty much perform the same
thing, I have a core that
Seems like there will be cases where you will want to print
the 'not_a_date' value instead of throwing an exception.
Without a bit more detail, however, it is unclear to me
how this bears on a default constructor. You can already
test a date to find out if it is not_a_date_time?
Default Construction
It would be useful if default constructors for gregorian::date and
posix_time::ptime were provided. The default constructors could maybe work
as follows:
gregorian::date() == gregorian::date(not_a_date_time)
posix_time::ptime() ==
Default Construction
It would be useful if default constructors for gregorian::date and
posix_time::ptime were provided. The default constructors could maybe
work
as follows:
gregorian::date() == gregorian::date(not_a_date_time)
posix_time::ptime() ==
