RE: [boost] Formal Review for Boost I/O Library

2003-03-03 Thread Paul A. Bristow
I vote for acceptance of this package (from reading the documentation and glancing at the code and examples - which could be more commented?). I noted two tiny mistakes in the documentation streambuf_wrapping.html in Rationale ... is defined with the appropiate <<< mis-spelt appropriate ..acce

RE: [boost] Formal Review for Boost I/O Library

2003-03-03 Thread Keith Burton
Another CVS challenged voice In lieu of a zip file , I would vote for inclusion on the basis of previous use of the io state savers Keith Burton ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

RE: [boost] Formal Review for Boost I/O Library

2003-03-03 Thread Paul A. Bristow
For those of us who find CVS difficult, a zip of the whole modest-sized package would be more friendly. Paul Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04 Mobile mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message