uring
editing - to my total astonishment :-((
So this may be too advanced a solution for MSVC 7.1 ?
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terje Slettebø
| Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 2:33 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [bo
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terje Slettebø
| Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 2:33 AM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Math Constants Formal Review
| This is tested on Intel C++ 7.1, but it shoul
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terje Slettebø
| Sent: 22 June 2003 02:33
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] Math Constants Formal Review
|
| I've finally managed to catch up with mailing list postings,
|
I've finally managed to catch up with mailing list postings, and have now
read through the review postings of this library.
First, I'd like to thank Paul for the work he's done with the library,
having gone through no less two formal reviews (a dubious pleasure that
Robert Ramey may experience wit
of constants.
Paul
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reece Dunn
| Sent: 06 June 2003 15:47
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [boost] Math Constants Formal
Neal D. Becker wrote:
Does anyone else think it's confusing that:
const float e = 0.5772156649015328606065120900824024310422F; // Euler e
This is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Euler-MascheroniConstant.html), and is denoted
by a gamma or as C:
const float C = 0.57721
Does anyone else think it's confusing that:
const float e = 0.5772156649015328606065120900824024310422F; // Euler e
I would have expected e to be 2.71828...
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
