RE: [boost] Re: Math constants - nearest values - are they valued?

2003-06-25 Thread Paul A. Bristow
EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guillaume Melquiond | Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:59 AM | To: Boost mailing list | Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Math constants - nearest values | | | On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Paul A Bristow wrote: | | > | Consequently, more than one constant out of 1 may suffer | >

RE: [boost] Re: Math constants - nearest values

2003-06-25 Thread Guillaume Melquiond
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Paul A Bristow wrote: > | Consequently, more than one constant out of 1 may suffer > | from this problem. So it is rare, but it is not impossible. > | It's why I was suggesting that a library should provide a > | mean to know if a number representing a constant is the

RE: [boost] Re: Math constants - nearest values

2003-06-22 Thread Paul A Bristow
| -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of | Guillaume Melquiond | Sent: 21 June 2003 23:51 | To: Boost mailing list | Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Advanced match constants scheme | Consequently, more than one constant out of 1 may suff