> I think ACE is an almost perfect model for what we want. The main
I agree there are many good things about ACE.
> things I would like to see done differently in boost are
>
> 1) Use namespaces.
> 2) Support exception handling.
> 3) Use std containers.
> 3) Use other boost libraries.
Yes and:
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 21:22, Hugo Duncan wrote:
> > is_set -> count (I'm not fussed about this one)
> Not sure about "count", how about something like "active"
Yes, or "contains"?
> > Also for library implementors I think we need
> > update_width()
> > To be called after the OS has updated the f
