> From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> The huge advantage appears when you start looking at arithmetic
> expressions. The result of
>
> if (t < u)
> {
> x = y + z * w;
> }
>
> could be a lot more predictable if we were working with types that
> didn't perform implicit lossy c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> From: Thorsten Ottosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > What would the advantage be over using boost::numeric_cast
>> directly, and
>> > thus explicitly?
>>
>> you would't have to worry about if you forgot a numeric_cast
>> somewhere in
>> your code
>> or if you com
> From: Thorsten Ottosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > What would the advantage be over using boost::numeric_cast
> directly, and
> > thus explicitly?
>
> you would't have to worry about if you forgot a numeric_cast
> somewhere in
> your code
> or if you compiled on a platform with different r