Re: [Boost-cmake] boost-cmake M.O.

troy d. straszheim wrote: > Repost of a snippet of Doug Gregor's original announcement of this list > and call for volunteers: > >> A small group of volunteers has been working on a new build system for >> Boost based on CMake, a cross-platform, open-source build system. We >> have reached the poi

Re: [Boost-cmake] Test feedback

Beman Dawes wrote: I didn't have a clue as to what BOOST_BUILD_SLAVE_HOSTNAME should be, so just left it blank. That resulted in the "Traash Demo" Hostname being set to bgd.myhome.westell.com , which I doubt is meaningful. meaningful enough What

Re: [Boost-cmake] Test feedback

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:25 AM, troy d. straszheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Beman Dawes wrote: > >>I didn't have a clue as to what BOOST_BUILD_SLAVE_HOSTNAME should >>be, so just left it blank. That resulted in the "Traash Demo" >>Hostname being set to bgd.myhome.westell.com >>

[Boost-cmake] Component-based installers in CPack

Kitware just accepted my patch to build component-based installers with CMake. This is the change that allowed the construction of "modular" Boost binary installers directly with CMake, where one can select which Boost libraries (and what parts of those Boost libraries) to install. This functionall

Re: [Boost-cmake] Component-based installers in CPack

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kitware just accepted my patch to build component-based installers > with CMake. Good work! > This is the change that allowed the construction of > "modular" Boost binary installers directly with CMake, where one can > s