Bill Hoffman wrote:
So, at boost con we talked about setting up CDash for Boost. I think
it would be much easier to maintain the CMake files for Boost if such a
testing system were in place.
I definitely agree.
-t
___
Boost-cmake mailing list
troy d. straszheim wrote:
Well, there was some discussion about this over on the -dev list. I
would like to have cmake removed completely from boost svn to avoid
confusion. Vladimir Prus has pointed out that the locations of the
cmakefiles violate some code-organization standards.
Due to
Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
Excerpts from troy d. straszheim's message of Wed Sep 16 17:08:44 +0200 2009:
Thanks for the patches. I tested and pushed to 1.40.0 branch of cmake repo.
-t
Will these patches land in boost SVN & its next release too?
Well, there was some discussion about this over
Excerpts from troy d. straszheim's message of Wed Sep 16 17:08:44 +0200 2009:
> Thanks for the patches. I tested and pushed to 1.40.0 branch of cmake repo.
>
> -t
Will these patches land in boost SVN & its next release too?
--
Exherbo KDE, X.org maintainer
_
Claudio Bley wrote:
Hi.
With Boost 1.40.0 and using CMake 2.6.4 building the Python library
failed because the compiler could not find some header of the parameter
library. (sorry, don't have the compiler message at hand).
This happend after I ran "nmake modularize && nmake":
Thanks for the p
Hi.
With Boost 1.40.0 and using CMake 2.6.4 building the Python library
failed because the compiler could not find some header of the parameter
library. (sorry, don't have the compiler message at hand).
This happend after I ran "nmake modularize && nmake":
,
| [ 34%] Building CXX object
lib
