Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-10 Thread troy d. straszheim
Justin Holewinski wrote: Nevermind the link errors, it was the dependency issue between inspect and Boost.System that you fixed in Friday's commit. I updated my local repository yesterday on Windows, but not on Mac. The compile error in Boost.Wave just needs the following fix (in /boost/wa

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-10 Thread Justin Holewinski
Nevermind the link errors, it was the dependency issue between inspect and Boost.System that you fixed in Friday's commit. I updated my local repository yesterday on Windows, but not on Mac. The compile error in Boost.Wave just needs the following fix (in /boost/wave/cpplexer/re2clex/cpp_re2c_lex

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-10 Thread troy d. straszheim
Justin Holewinski wrote: After fixing that, the build is successful with both Intel C++ and Visual Studio 9. Ah that was a dumb error. Thanks for the fix. I'm still looking into the link errors on Mac and Linux with Intel C++. I've got intel for linux... I don't see any link errors

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-10 Thread Justin Holewinski
The only problem I see is a typo in BoostConfig.cmake: elseif(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER MATCHES "/icpc$" OR CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER MATCHES "/icpc.exe$" OR CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_MATCHES "/icl.exe$") The last check has an underscore between CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER and MATCHES, which throws a warning dur

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-09 Thread troy d. straszheim
Justin Holewinski wrote: Yes, I'm using your 1.40.0 distribution from gitorious.org . I downloaded it about a week ago, so it does not include the October 8 commits. I'll try the latest revision today sometime. Has the CMake build system been tested with CMake 2.8/2.9?

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-09 Thread Justin Holewinski
Yes, I'm using your 1.40.0 distribution from gitorious.org. I downloaded it about a week ago, so it does not include the October 8 commits. I'll try the latest revision today sometime. Has the CMake build system been tested with CMake 2.8/2.9? This error does not occur if I use CMake 2.6.4, just

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-09 Thread troy d. straszheim
Justin Holewinski wrote: Thanks! The dependency error is fixed on Windows with the latest nightly binary. However, this version of CMake seems to break the Boost install target. Running "make install" results in errors from not finding libs/preprocessor/include/boost in the source tree, wh

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread Philip Lowman
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote: > Hi Philip, > On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Justin Holewinski > wrote: > >> >> I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version >> 11.1, using CMake and I've en

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread Justin Holewinski
Thanks! The dependency error is fixed on Windows with the latest nightly binary. However, this version of CMake seems to break the Boost install target. Running "make install" results in errors from not finding libs/preprocessor/include/boost in the source tree, which does not exist. This occurs

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread Bill Hoffman
Justin Holewinski wrote: I have no idea why this is happening. When using the Visual Studio toolset, the dynamic-link libraries are placed in bin/ and the import libraries are placed in lib/, like you would expect. Why this is not the case when using the Intel compiler, I have no idea. Pe

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread troy d. straszheim
Philip Lowman wrote: Hi, I can fix this in CVS, but might have a slightly better way. Can you tell me what the value of CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID is on Intel C++? I pushed the recommended change to the 1.40.0 branch in git, will make another bugfix release if we can get these strange intel (

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread Belcourt, Kenneth
Hi Philip, On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Justin Holewinski > wrote: I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version 11.1, using CMake and I've encountered two issues so far. First, on Windows, the Intel C++ Compile

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-08 Thread Justin Holewinski
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Justin Holewinski > wrote: > >> >> I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version >> 11.1, using CMake and I've encountered two issues so far. >> >> >> First, on Windows, the Intel C++

Re: [Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-07 Thread Philip Lowman
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version > 11.1, using CMake and I've encountered two issues so far. > > > First, on Windows, the Intel C++ Compiler follows Microsoft's naming > convention. The compiler ex

[Boost-cmake] Issues with Intel C++

2009-10-07 Thread Justin Holewinski
I am trying to compile Boost 1.40 with the Intel C++ Compiler, Version 11.1, using CMake and I've encountered two issues so far. First, on Windows, the Intel C++ Compiler follows Microsoft's naming convention. The compiler executable is icl.exe, not icc.exe or icpc.exe. Hence, the BoostConfig.cm