Ingo Albrecht wrote:
It is totally automated. You can run devenv /build on the command
line or use msbuild, they do not pop up a gui. ctest uses devenv
/build. All of this is already automated by ctest. The question is
about log scrapping, which needs to be done. However, vs does create
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Ingo Albrecht wrote:
> ... Since VS2005, there is another tool called vcbuild
> that does not only emit messages on its stdout but can also dump them
> into a good old text file. As I already noted earlier, it can also prefix
> lines with specific severity levels w
Bill Hoffman schrieb:
Beman Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, David Abrahams
wrote:
But the real problem here is that anyone wanting to contribute a
testing
server will have a tough time making good use of his hardware, because
--- unless I'm mistaken --- you can't automate the V
David Abrahams schrieb:
on Thu Feb 05 2009, Michael Jackson wrote:
There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
makefiles" with
the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-June/022178.html is one of the
rele
David Abrahams wrote:
It is totally automated. You can run devenv /build on the command line or use
msbuild, they do not pop up a gui. ctest uses devenv /build. All of this is
already
automated by ctest. The question is about log scrapping, which needs to be
done.
However, vs does create
on Sun Feb 08 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> But the real problem here is that anyone wanting to contribute a testing
>>> server will have a tough time making good use of his hardware, because
>>> --- unless I'm mis
Beman Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
But the real problem here is that anyone wanting to contribute a testing
server will have a tough time making good use of his hardware, because
--- unless I'm mistaken --- you can't automate the VS-based builds.
...or am
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> But the real problem here is that anyone wanting to contribute a testing
> server will have a tough time making good use of his hardware, because
> --- unless I'm mistaken --- you can't automate the VS-based builds.
>
> ...or am I missing so
on Sat Feb 07 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Thu Feb 05 2009, Michael Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
>>> makefiles"
> with
>>> the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
>>>
>>> http://www.cmake
David Abrahams wrote:
on Thu Feb 05 2009, Michael Jackson wrote:
There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
makefiles" with
the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-June/022178.html is one of the
relevant
on Thu Feb 05 2009, Michael Jackson wrote:
> There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
> makefiles" with
> the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
>
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-June/022178.html is one of the
> relevant
> threads.
>
Michael Jackson schrieb:
There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
makefiles" with the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-June/022178.html is one of
the relevant threads.
Here is another thread that has
There are those in the CMake community that successfully combine "unix
makefiles" with the Visual Studio Compilers to perform parallel builds.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-June/022178.html is one of
the relevant threads.
Here is another thread that has some important informati
13 matches
Mail list logo
