Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-04 Thread William Mills
On 05/04/2018 01:03 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.05.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Alexander Graf: >> On 05/04/2018 06:20 PM, William Mills wrote: >>> On 05/04/2018 11:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> I am missing something.  If there is only MBR and no GPT then there is >>> no GUID type for EFI Parti

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05/04/2018 06:20 PM, William Mills wrote: [explicitly cc'ing boot-arch to see if this solves the TI auth problems] On 05/04/2018 11:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 05/04/2018 04:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 04/05/2018 15:46, Grant Likely wrote: On 03/05/2018 09:43, Daniel Thompson wrote:

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-04 Thread William Mills
[explicitly cc'ing boot-arch to see if this solves the TI auth problems] On 05/04/2018 11:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 05/04/2018 04:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> On 04/05/2018 15:46, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On 03/05/2018 09:43, Daniel Thompson wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:09:15PM -

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-04 Thread Leif Lindholm
(Whoops, boot-architecture wasn't on cc on this thread, forwarding message there for public archiving. Please add arm.ebbr-discuss to cc on any replies.) On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:09:15PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:48:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > > On 02/05/2018 22:2

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] Booting from eMMC without the boot protocol

2018-05-04 Thread Grant Likely
On 04/05/2018 16:00, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:46:52PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: [...] Can we start a list of SoCs that have special requirements on the boot eMMC/SD/USB? It would be useful to see the cross-section of requirements. I've created a wiki page to start capturing