Thanks Grant
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Likely [mailto:grant.lik...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:44 AM
> To: boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com
> Cc: Udit Kumar ; Grant Likely
> Subject: [PATCH] v0.6-pre1 draft comments responses
>
> Edits
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Likely [mailto:grant.lik...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:33 AM
> To: Udit Kumar ; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org;
> arm.ebbr-discuss
> Cc: Ben Eckermann ; Varun Sethi
>
> Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR v0.6-pre1 Released
>
> On
On 11.07.18 22:15, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 21:13, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> On 9 July 2018 at 06:17, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Editing in response to comments from Bill Mills, Daniel Thompson, and
>>> Alex Graf. Mostly trivial editorial, but did flush out the discussion of
On 11/07/2018 21:13, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 9 July 2018 at 06:17, Grant Likely wrote:
Editing in response to comments from Bill Mills, Daniel Thompson, and
Alex Graf. Mostly trivial editorial, but did flush out the discussion of
how future updates to the specification would be handled
Edits responding to comments from Udit Kumar
Suggested-by: Udit Kumar
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
---
source/chapter1-about.rst | 16 +---
source/chapter4-firmware-media.rst | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source/chapter1-about.rst
Hi Grant,
On 9 July 2018 at 06:17, Grant Likely wrote:
> Editing in response to comments from Bill Mills, Daniel Thompson, and
> Alex Graf. Mostly trivial editorial, but did flush out the discussion of
> how future updates to the specification would be handled, and added a
> note about DT platfor
On 09/07/2018 13:39, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
- While ACPI provides more standardization, Devicetree is preferred in may
embedded
- platforms for its flexibility.
+ While ACPI provides more standardization, Devicetree is preferred in ma
On 11/07/2018 06:33, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
Few comments
1/ 1.1 Introduction
For example, an Arm A-class embedded networking platform
to
For example, an Arm A-class embedded platform
done
2/ 1.2 Guiding Principals
EBBR as a specification defines requirements
to
EBBR as a specif
On 09/07/2018 19:47, Dong Wei wrote:
Grant,
We don't need to change anything in the UEFI Spec. All we need to do is to
request the addition of /Firmware directory in the registry. You can send the
request to the USWG chair. There is a link on that page to send the request.
Okay, I'll do that
On 9 July 2018 at 17:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> All PM domain drivers must be built-in (at least those using DT), so
> there is no point deferring probe after initcalls are done. Continuing
> to defer probe may prevent booting successfully even if managing PM
> domains is not required. This can happ
On 10 July 2018 at 16:25, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:49 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 9 July 2018 at 17:41, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > All PM domain drivers must be built-in (at least those using DT), so
>> > there is no point deferring probe after initcalls are done. Continuing
11 matches
Mail list logo
