Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Regarding capsule update, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:45:28PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 21:15, Heinrich Schuchardt a > écrit : > > On 3/10/20 5:02 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: (snip) > > > VI - UEFI update capsules > > > Following my view in 0) I think this shall be made m

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 3/11/20 12:04 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 3/10/20 7:37 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 18:37, Daniel Thompson a écrit : On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: 0.2 - normative text The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guidin

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 3/10/20 7:37 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 18:37, Daniel Thompson a écrit : On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: 0.2 - normative text The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding Principles" normative? IETF and ETSI have diff

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 3/10/20 9:45 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 21:15, Heinrich Schuchardt a écrit : On 3/10/20 5:02 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: Hi, Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. Here are some topics that may ne

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 21:15, Heinrich Schuchardt a écrit : > On 3/10/20 5:02 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure > > boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. > > > > Here are some topics that may need some clarification

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 3/10/20 5:02 PM, Francois Ozog wrote: Hi, Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. Here are some topics that may need some clarification on the EBBR specs and It looks timely to start working on EBBR evolution. 0.1 - EB

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 18:46, Mark Brown a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:37:29PM +, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > > > Thanks Leif for the links. I tend to like the ETSI one because it is > > > somewhat complete on necessar

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 18:37, Daniel Thompson a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > > > 0.2 - normative text > > > > The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding > > > > Principles" normative? > > > > > > > > IETF and ETSI have differen

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:35:40PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > > 0.2 - normative text > > > The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding > > > Principles" normative? > > > > > > IETF and ETSI have different language conventions to express > > > absolutely mandated and variou

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 18:19, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure > > boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. > > > > Here are some topics that may need som

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > Hi, > > Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure > boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. > > Here are some topics that may need some clarification on the EBBR > specs and It looks timely to start wo

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 17:18, Grant Likely wrote: > > Hi Francois, > > This is really good. EBBR regular meetings have been on hold while the > U-Boot work progressed, but it is probably about time to start them up > again. This is list is a great first agenda item. > > Comments below... > > On 10

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Grant Likely
Hi Francois, This is really good. EBBR regular meetings have been on hold while the U-Boot work progressed, but it is probably about time to start them up again. This is list is a great first agenda item. Comments below... On 10/03/2020 16:02, Francois Ozog wrote: Hi, Following implementation

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Leif Lindholm
Minor comment: On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 17:02:27 +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > 0.2 - normative text > The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding > Principles" normative? > > IETF and ETSI have different language conventions to express > absolutely mandated and various levels

RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-03-10 Thread Francois Ozog
Hi, Following implementation (or work towards) of EBBR 1.0 + UEFI Secure boot + UEFI update capsule we learnt a lot. Here are some topics that may need some clarification on the EBBR specs and It looks timely to start working on EBBR evolution. 0.1 - EBBR goal May be a reassessment on the "for w