Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Sumit Garg
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 22:21, Grant Likely wrote: > > On 12/03/2020 04:58, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 03:11, Francois Ozog > > wrote: > >> > >> Le mer. 11 mars 2020 à 22:22, Heinrich Schuchardt a > >> écrit : > >> > >>> On 3/11/20 12:10 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue

Re: [DTE] Why device trees are not static

2020-05-20 Thread Simon Glass
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 09:45, François Ozog wrote: > > > Le mer. 20 mai 2020 à 17:37, Daniel Thompson > a écrit : > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:59:04AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 20:34, Frank Rowand >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Heinrich, >> > > >> > > On

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 5/20/20 7:49 PM, François Ozog wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 19:30, Daniel Thompson > mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>> wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:00:53PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 18:39, Daniel Thompson > mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 20.05.20 18:39, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: >> On 11/03/2020 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: We have the following cases: - FW compatible with GPT (I mean f

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:00:53PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 18:39, Daniel Thompson > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On 11/03/2020 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Francois

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread François Ozog
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 18:39, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > > On 11/03/2020 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > > > We have the following cases: > > > > > > > > - FW compa

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > On 11/03/2020 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote: > > > We have the following cases: > > > > > > - FW compatible with GPT (I mean firmware can be searched based on > > > GU

Re: RFC: EBBR specification update

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > On 12/03/2020 04:58, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 03:11, Francois Ozog > > wrote: > > > > > > Le mer. 11 mars 2020 à 22:22, Heinrich Schuchardt a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > On 3/11/20 12:10 PM, Daniel Thompson wro

Re: [DTE] Why device trees are not static

2020-05-20 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 20 mai 2020 à 17:37, Daniel Thompson a écrit : > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:59:04AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 20:34, Frank Rowand > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > > > On 5/16/20 8:46 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > On 5/15/20 7:10 AM

Re: [DTE] Why device trees are not static

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:59:04AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 20:34, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > On 5/16/20 8:46 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 5/15/20 7:10 AM, François Ozog wrote: > > > > > >> Would the topic of dynamic parts of

Re: [DTE] Why device trees are not static

2020-05-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 20:34, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > On 5/16/20 8:46 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 5/15/20 7:10 AM, François Ozog wrote: > > > >> Would the topic of dynamic parts of device trees deserve two slides on > >> our next meeting? > >> > >> This is

Re: [DTE] May 27th call agenda

2020-05-20 Thread Grant Likely
On 18/05/2020 17:42, CVS wrote: but nothing came up on the right hand side Hmmm... Sorry about that. Turns out problem was on my side. I didn't want to use the precompiled dtc binary in the repo, so I removed it and just used the Debian packaged dtc which didn't work. Building mainline dtc and

Re: [DTE] May 27th call agenda

2020-05-20 Thread Joakim Bech
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:12:59PM +0530, CVS wrote: > > but nothing came up on the right hand side > Hmmm... Sorry about that. I had the same issue initially, but I believe doing 'chmod' did the job. I now have dtv-demo up and running. I think this tool and the idea is a really great thing, thanks