Re: OS provided DT proposal

2024-05-08 Thread Elliot Berman
(resending now that I can post to boot-architecture) On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:00:47AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 4:18 PM Humphreys, Jonathan > wrote: > > [1] Rather than using the device tree source filename, to have more > > flexibility, > > one can conceive an ID or

Re: OS provided DT proposal

2024-05-08 Thread Sumit Garg
Hi Rob et al, First of all, for clarity I have been a supporter of the firmware provided devicetree as you can see from my recent talk [1] at EOSS24. But I also do recognise the current DT ABI stability challenges faced by the embedded community leading to this OS provided DT proposal. This propos

Re: OS provided DT proposal

2024-05-08 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:17:02PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:05:25PM -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 01:13:00PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 09:18:01PM +, Humphreys, Jonathan wrote: > > > > Problem statement: