Re: EBBR monthly rescheduled to 4th June (Was: EBBR Monthly - 4th Tuesday)

binson; Tony Wu; > tom.r...@konsulko.com; Yang Zhang; Nicusor Penisoara; Andreas Färber; > Michal Simek; David Rusling; Peter Jones; Mark Brown; Matthias Brugger; > daniel.thomp...@linaro.org; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: EBBR Monthly - 4th Tuesday > > Evidently I

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] New series of EBBR meetings

works for me as it avoids a clash... On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 15:11 Grant Likely wrote: > I accidentally deleted the old series of EBBR meetings. However, that's > okay since other meetings have moved around and it is time to review the > meeting time anyway. > > I think we should switch to bi-week

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [PATCH 7/7] Don't provide SetVariable() if GetVariable() doesn't work

I'll attempt not to add noise into an otherwise detailed and technical discussion, but I like to go back to first principles: [1] Does Peter's suggested mechanism extend the use model that exists between a kernel and UEFI? If so, I would suggest that that is dangerous ground. As a side note, is t

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [PATCH v2] Refactor ResetSystem() requirements

Thanks Daniel, that really helped me understand both sides of this discussion... had to write some pseudo-code to think it through though... David On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, 10:32 Daniel Thompson, wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 03:53:17AM +, Udit Kumar wrote: > > Hi Daniel > > > > > > +ResetSyst

Linaro blog post on 'the boot problem'

See here for a shoutout to EBBR and U-Boot... David -- David A Rusling CTO, Linaro https://linaro.org ___ boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR Weekly - Agenda 30 Aug 2018

Cool, and a poster... On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 15:54 Grant Likely wrote: > On 30/08/2018 15:19, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > I'm off this week so can't join the call. I've asked the FreeBSD guys to > prepare something too, that looks promising. > > Nice! > > > I can also create a si

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 17:24 Alexander Graf wrote: > EBBR itself isn't concerned with how the device tree gets into Linux, as > long as firmware provides it one way or another and allows for updates. > Whether firmware consumes it from yet another layer or not IMHO is out > of scope of EBBR. > >

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

Steve (hi), I'm following https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi3, but support for RPi 3b+ (the + is important) is not working. Let's chat offline... David On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 15:39 David Rusling wrote: > Daniel > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 14:06 Daniel Thompson > wrot

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

Daniel On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 14:06 Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 01:16:08PM +0100, David Rusling wrote: > > [4] There's not yet a standard 64 bit aarch64 release of Debian buster > > (9). That's terrible progress. I managed to build my own but

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

Tom On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 15:10 Alexander Graf wrote: > On 07/30/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: > >> Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the > >> way I learnt various things: > &g

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

folklore' up, but it is a mess compared to pretty much any Intel board. The shame is that the Raspberry Pi is probably the best supported aarch64 device that there is... David On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 17:56 David Rusling wrote: > Tom, > thanks, I appreciate all of your hard work, the

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

Tom, thanks, I appreciate all of your hard work, the code base looks good.. David On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 16:11 Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 01:55:51PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM, David Rusling > wrote: > > > Peter, >

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

Peter, thanks, that was one explanation that I hadn't thought of (32b = 32 bits). Really helpful, onwards and upwards... David On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 13:42 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling > wrote: > > All, > > I decided to

U-boot

All, I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+ this time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of fiddling, both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if anyone needs anything. So, u-boot. I can build the normal con

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [PATCH] Introduction: add a manifesto

+1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2018, 5:26 PM Grant Likely wrote: > Give some rationale behind EBBR so the reader understands what problem > the specification is intended to solve. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Mills > [glikely: made it more verbose to make the intent clear] > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > --- >

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

Olof Johansson > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:58 AM > To: Dong Wei > Cc: David Rusling ; wmi...@ti.com; > boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss < > arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device > > On Tue, Jun

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

Bill On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 21:01 William Mills wrote: > > > I think it's likely useful to fog/edge but not critical, it will > > depend a lot on the size of the device. In the arm space it'll be > > either EBBR or SBBR/SBSA, either way standardisation will be good. > > > > > > Well,

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

rdware > requirements in EBBR if needed, but at this time no plan for EBSA. > > > >- DW > > > > *From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-boun...@arm.com > *On Behalf Of *David Rusling > *Sent:* Monday, June 11, 2018 4:53 AM > *To:* Peter Robinson > *Cc:* boot-architecture@lists.l

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

to broaden those documents to include embedded)? David On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 12:12 David Rusling wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 11:52 Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:40 AM, David Rusling >> wrote: >> > All, >> > I'm writing a

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 11:52 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:40 AM, David Rusling > wrote: > > All, > > I'm writing a blog on Linaro's reorganisation (sounds fascinating > doesn't > > it?). I'm more talking about directions

EBBR - Fog, Edge and Device

All, I'm writing a blog on Linaro's reorganisation (sounds fascinating doesn't it?). I'm more talking about directions than teams etc, it's not a list of groups / SIGs etc. One area I'd like to highlight is the importance of EBBR to LEDGE (aka Fog and Networking). Some thoughts / questions: