Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-08-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Grant, Just seen this - out at DebConf in Taiwan this week. David - can you expand on your point [4] below please? Not sure what you're referring to with limited context... On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:06:26PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: >[Looping in Steve McIntyre] > >Steve, are you to comment

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread David Rusling
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 17:24 Alexander Graf wrote: > EBBR itself isn't concerned with how the device tree gets into Linux, as > long as firmware provides it one way or another and allows for updates. > Whether firmware consumes it from yet another layer or not IMHO is out > of scope of EBBR. > >

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Alexander Graf
On 07/30/2018 06:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:11 AM Alexander Graf wrote: On 07/30/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the way I learnt various things: [1] R

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:11 AM Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07/30/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: > >> Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the > >> way I learnt various things: > >> > >> [1] Raspberry Pi's first s

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread David Rusling
Steve (hi), I'm following https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi3, but support for RPi 3b+ (the + is important) is not working. Let's chat offline... David On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 15:39 David Rusling wrote: > Daniel > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 14:06 Daniel Thompson > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 30,

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread David Rusling
Daniel On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 14:06 Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 01:16:08PM +0100, David Rusling wrote: > > [4] There's not yet a standard 64 bit aarch64 release of Debian buster > > (9). That's terrible progress. I managed to build my own but not > > without a lot of faf

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread David Rusling
Tom On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 15:10 Alexander Graf wrote: > On 07/30/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: > >> Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the > >> way I learnt various things: > >> > >> [1] Raspberry Pi's first

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Alexander Graf
On 07/30/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: Success.   I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works.   Along the way I learnt various things: [1] Raspberry Pi's first stage loader generates the device tree.   Overlays are used to turn various th

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Grant Likely
[Looping in Steve McIntyre] Steve, are you to comment on the 64-bit Arm support in Debian that David was running into? g. On 30/07/2018 13:16, David Rusling wrote: Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the way I learnt various things: [1] Raspberry Pi's first stage

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 01:16:08PM +0100, David Rusling wrote: > [4] There's not yet a standard 64 bit aarch64 release of Debian buster > (9). That's terrible progress. I managed to build my own but not > without a lot of faffing about. Is the real problem: a) That there is no AArch64 Debian

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread Alexander Graf
On 07/30/2018 02:16 PM, David Rusling wrote: Success.   I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works.   Along the way I learnt various things: [1] Raspberry Pi's first stage loader generates the device tree.   Overlays are used to turn various things on (for example sound) at boot time. Ye

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-30 Thread David Rusling
Success. I now have a u-boot built on Arm64 that works. Along the way I learnt various things: [1] Raspberry Pi's first stage loader generates the device tree. Overlays are used to turn various things on (for example sound) at boot time. [2] There's a big difference between fdt_addr and fdt

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-26 Thread David Rusling
Tom, thanks, I appreciate all of your hard work, the code base looks good.. David On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 16:11 Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 01:55:51PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM, David Rusling > wrote: > > > Peter, > > >thanks, that was o

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM, David Rusling wrote: > Peter, >thanks, that was one explanation that I hadn't thought of (32b = 32 > bits). Really helpful, onwards and upwards... FYI they work fine 32 and 64 bits on both the 3B and 3B+ for me, only currently tested 64 bit with uefi but the

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-26 Thread David Rusling
Peter, thanks, that was one explanation that I hadn't thought of (32b = 32 bits). Really helpful, onwards and upwards... David On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 13:42 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling > wrote: > > All, > > I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bo

Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] U-boot

2018-07-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling wrote: > All, > I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+ this > time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of fiddling, > both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if > a