On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 10:55 AM, Gyepi SAM wrote:
I used the 'Content-Disposition' header [1] for a long time, but
eventually gave
up and simply appended the filename to the url because some versions
of IE ignore the
the headers altogether. I think it was a workaround to fix the
Yet another opportunity to display my ignorance :)
I've got a script which reads a config file to get a database username and
password, among other things. What should the permissions be so that the
cgi script running on the web server can read the file, but random users on
the system can't? Is
I've got a script which reads a config file to get a database username and
password, among other things. What should the permissions be so that the
cgi script running on the web server can read the file, but
random users on
the system can't? Is this the best way for the script to get
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 09:13 AM, Joel Gwynn wrote:
I've got a script which reads a config file to get a database username
and
password, among other things. What should the permissions be so that
the
cgi script running on the web server can read the file, but random
users on
the system
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Wizard wrote:
I've got a script which reads a config file to get a database
username and
password, among other things. What should the permissions be so that
the
cgi script running on the web server can read the file, but
random users on
the system
I'm more concerned about other pair users being able to access the file.
Currently, the file is stored above the document root, but it has to be
readable by the cgi script, hence the user nobody in group www.
-Original Message-
From: Wizard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:19:17AM -0500, Joel Gwynn wrote:
I'm more concerned about other pair users being able to access the file.
Currently, the file is stored above the document root, but it has to be
readable by the cgi script, hence the user nobody in group www.
Without help from a
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:26:40PM -0500, Bob Rogers wrote:
From: John Tobey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:42:29 -0500
The clean and safe solution would be to run your own copy of the web
server (if allowed) or configure the existing server for suExec (if
Boston.pm will be having a social meeting on Thursday, March 6, at Boston
Beer Works (Fenway). We'll start at 7pm and end when everybody leaves.
Boston Beer Works is at 61 Brookline Avenue in Boston, across from Fenway
park.
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
Boston.pm will be having a social meeting on Thursday, March 6, at Boston
Beer Works (Fenway). We'll start at 7pm and end when everybody leaves.
Boston Beer Works is at 61 Brookline Avenue in Boston, across from Fenway
park.
10 matches
Mail list logo