On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:41:55PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] supershited:
use strict;
use warnings should be here too.
Thank you; that sounds like a good idea. (Though usually my main
interest in manipulating perl warnings is shutting them up in production
That still leaves at least Bricolage Slash though,
Biggest difference is Bricolage is workflow strong, and Slash is comment
voting strong.
and I know there
are several others (Mason, etc).
Mason is a framework to build a Portal, not a CMS system. Which are we looking
for?
Perl.com is
Simon Cozens created Bryar:
http://blog.simon-cozens.org/bryar/bryar.cgi
He is now working on his next generation publishing tool, Feuilleton:
http://feuilleton.simon-cozens.org/
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:14:49 -0400, Bill Ricker N1VUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That still leaves at least
Bob Rogers wrote:
I think I'm already well past that point in terms of option-parsing
complexity. I have places where the command_line_options method calls
SUPER::command_line_options in order to replace/rename options, so I
need some way to supercede and/or rename things.
got it. I had to
Greg London wrote:
Bob Rogers wrote:
I have places where the command_line_options method calls
SUPER::command_line_options in order to replace/rename options, so I
need some way to supercede and/or rename things.
Hey, just a random thought, but rather than building up a simple
string in
Well, I doubt this is what you're looking for, but it does assume that a
person's home directory is named the same as their username.
-Eric
Kripa Sundar wrote:
Hello all,
I wanted to find out if an input word is a valid login name
on my system or not.
So, I wrote this:
16: sub warn_if_bogus {
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 04:03:33PM -0400, Kripa Sundar wrote:
20: warn blah blah\n if (glob(~$arg) !~ m{^ (/\w+)+ /$arg $}x);
globIn list context, returns a (possibly empty) list of filename
expansions on the value of EXPR such as the standard Unix shell
From: David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:11:29 +0100
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:41:55PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] supershited:
use strict;
use warnings should be here too.
Thank you; that sounds like a good idea.
From: Greg London [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:43:38 -0400
. . .
A quick email to Damian with your rule search/replace/rename
question might get you a quick answer. who knows, Damian
might be able to tweak it while he's on a long flight somewhere.
If you
BR == Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BR problem. In particular, I have had to use
BR no warnings 'recursion';
BR on occasion because the implementers of perl thought it sufficiently
BR abnormal to be worth a warning if a particular function is ever entered
BR 100 times more
10 matches
Mail list logo
