hi
( 04.11.03 21:29 -0800 ) Ranga Nathan:
Needless to say 99% is spam!
I have some 28MB worth of mail sitting somewhere, waiting to be
delivered. I want that 28MB mail to be filtered and forwarded to my
cox.net address.
so 28MB * 0.99 = 27.72MB of SPAM, 0.28MB of HAM
let's say the average
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 09:29:02PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote:
I want to filter my mail from sendmail through SpamAssassin but redirect
to my cox.net address.
I understand that SpamAssassin requires filtering via procmail.
SpamAssassin does *not* require procmail. You are using procmail here
DA == Daniel Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DA formail -s command splits standard-input into valid messages and
DA executes command on each.
DA procmail -m conf-file runs procmail for a nonstandard conf file.
DA So for your procmailrc in the nonstandard location of
DA
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Uri Guttman wrote:
useless use of cat.
formail -s 'procmail -m /etc/.procmailrc' bigfileofspamandham
different strokes. by the same measure, it's a useless pipeline, plus the
single-quotes are superfluous. but the added clarity (to me) is worth the
extra
Not sure how you could get sendmail to do it, but with perl you could
probably do it in about 20-50 lines. Just pull the messages one by one,
if spamc exits 0, send it along.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 09:29:02PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote:
I want to filter my mail from sendmail through
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:08:56AM -0500, Anthony R. J. Ball wrote:
Not sure how you could get sendmail to do it, but with perl you could
probably do it in about 20-50 lines. Just pull the messages one by one,
if spamc exits 0, send it along.
If you already have all of this mail rattling
If you already have all of this mail rattling around, then use
'formail' to cause it to be re-delivered.
Technically, using formail for mail that's already rattling around is
just processing, not delivery. Only the MTA can deliver mail, perhaps
by using an external MDA. The distinction becomes
