Re: [Boston.pm] Simultaneous redirect to STDOUT File?

2005-05-10 Thread Ben Tilly
On 5/9/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT On 5/9/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT Be aware that IO::Tee has limitations. It only works for output that BT goes through

Re: [Boston.pm] Simultaneous redirect to STDOUT File?

2005-05-10 Thread Uri Guttman
BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT Secondly even in Perl I'd expect print to be faster than using .= BT repeatedly instead of print. Let's try it: BT $ time perl -e 'print hello world\n for 1..1_000_000' /dev/null BT real0m0.379s BT user0m0.380s BT sys

Re: [Boston.pm] Simultaneous redirect to STDOUT File?

2005-05-10 Thread Ben Tilly
On 5/10/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] BT Maintainability is more important than optimization. I often use BT this strategy for maintainance reasons. Going full-cycle, one way BT to accomplish all of this without changing code

Re: [Boston.pm] Simultaneous redirect to STDOUT File?

2005-05-10 Thread Uri Guttman
BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT On 5/10/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT [...] BT Maintainability is more important than optimization. I often use BT this strategy for maintainance reasons. Going full-cycle, one way

[Boston.pm] Yet Another Perl Conference final details

2005-05-10 Thread Gerard Lim
Hi everyone... There have been some recent developments on the YAPC::NA front, and it has been suggested to us that a reminder might be helpful to some people, so here's a quick summary of the event. Summary --- YAPC::NA 2005 (Yet Another Perl Conference, North America) in Toronto,