On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:23 AM, James Eshelman wrote:
I have a large O-O perl system running on Fedora Core 3 ( I know,
it's old! - that's a separate subject) on Xenon 64-bit
processors. The perl interpreter is only a 32-bit app. Anyone
have an idea how much performance boost we're
Thanks Sherm. It looks like there might be some benefit for high-end users
who are likely to go beyond 4GB VM but we can postpone it 'til then.
- Original Message -
From: Sherm Pendley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Eshelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: boston-pm@pm.org
Sent: Wednesday, June
Double check where the limit is. It may well be 2 GB.
Ben
On 6/21/06, James Eshelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Sherm. It looks like there might be some benefit for high-end users
who are likely to go beyond 4GB VM but we can postpone it 'til then.
- Original Message -
From:
At work, the 64bit Power4/Power5 IBM AIX systems come with 32-bit Perl.
After reading the README, I wasn't interested in building everything in
64-bit, so when I build a Perl to build DBI with, I build it with
similar settings to the vendor's (unsupported, contributed) 32-bit
Perl. If one of my
Hey Guys and Gals,
can anyone remind me how that pretty-printing module that El Damian
showcased the other year was called?
It was able to handle plurals (x file/s deleted), even irregular
ones, among the many things ;-)
I am not sure if it was the same module, but it certainly was the same
Hey Guys and Gals,
can anyone remind me how that pretty-printing module that El Damian
showcased the other year was called?
It was able to handle plurals (x file/s deleted), even irregular
ones, among the many things ;-)
I am not sure if it was the same module, but it certainly was the same
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:59, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
can anyone remind me how that pretty-printing module that El Damian
showcased the other year was called?
It was able to handle plurals (x file/s deleted), even irregular
ones, among the many things ;-)
