On 15/04/2013 19:35, Ben Tilly wrote:
I'm writing some C++ at the moment that fits into the first group
(performance-critical code). For unit testing I've been emitting TAP
protocol and testing it with prove, but are there better approaches?
I get a test file with a lot of code that looks
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:02 AM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
On 15/04/2013 19:35, Ben Tilly wrote:
I'm writing some C++ at the moment that fits into the first group
(performance-critical code). For unit testing I've been emitting TAP
protocol and testing it with prove, but
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:35:22AM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Greg London em...@greglondon.com wrote:
For unit testing I've been emitting TAP
protocol and testing it with prove, but are there better approaches?
I get a test file with a lot of code that looks
Instead, I generate the test file from a simpler data file that only
contains the relevant test data.
When I was verifying a hardware-based image converter,
I used that approach. You gave it an image file,
a small file that contained some register settings
that indicated what we wanted the
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Gyepi SAM gy...@praxis-sw.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:35:22AM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Greg London em...@greglondon.com wrote:
For unit testing I've been emitting TAP
protocol and testing it with prove, but are there
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Mike Small wrote:
Did you like Deitel and Deitel or was it a compromise
...for my part, I bought the their _C++ for Programmers_ book and immediately
regretted it. Their notion of for programmers seems to mean you managed to
get your microwave to stop
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:35:55AM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Gyepi SAM gy...@praxis-sw.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:35:22AM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Greg London em...@greglondon.com wrote:
For unit testing I've been
