On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 05:01:39PM -0500, John Macdonald wrote:
However, as I recall, NT was being developed for the Alpha at
one point - I think it was available commercially for a while
and not just internal to MS. Not to surprising, actually,
since a large chunk of the original NT design
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 03:20:13PM -0500, Tom Metro wrote:
Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Perl per se matters to you that much, then you should find some way
to make it your day job.
Hmmm...isn't that sort of what were talking about? If there's no job
market for Perl, that's kinda
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:01:32AM -0500, Greg London wrote:
From a game-theory point of view, I think certification is an overall win.
The worst case scenario for certification would be that gurus have to
get their manager to pay for them to take the test.
The worst case scenario for no
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:40:10PM -0500, Greg London wrote:
My worst case scenario assumed that programmers knew that perl was the
best language for the job at hand.
So, your analysis is limited to only those who accept that Perl is the
best language for the job? Hm
My point remains: if
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:01:46PM -0500, Sean Quinlan wrote:
The last time Perl had an upsurge in popularity, it
was because Perl solved a new class of problem better than anything
else. Might I suggest that the best way to increase adoption is to
learn from our past successes instead
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:20:30PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
well, we do have Acme:: for all the joke modules. no one should be
fooled by a module from that namespace. all new joke modules should go
there but some want their joke to be a little more realistic and sucker
people. a joke module
