On 10/26/05, Sherm Pendley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Tom Metro wrote:
I've often wondered if this greater power in mod_perl has been a
hindrance rather than a help to the Perl web development community.
Would we have been better off if, in addition to mod_perl
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:12:30PM -0400, Sherm Pendley wrote:
An admin doesn't have to allow the developer full access to
everything mod_perl can do.
Oh? I thought it was always possible to delve into Apache's guts.
A common configuration used with mod_perl is to service only static
On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:26 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:12:30PM -0400, Sherm Pendley wrote:
An admin doesn't have to allow the developer full access to
everything mod_perl can do.
Oh? I thought it was always possible to delve into Apache's guts.
Not at all. To add a
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Christopher Morgan wrote:
I'm looking for an affordable web hosting service that offers mod_perl. I
spoke with pair.com, who said mod_perl is only available on their dedicated
servers, which cost $200 - $400 per month. Does anyone know of a better
deal?
mod_perl is a
Thanks to all for the suggestions -- I'll do some digging!
- Chris
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
Simon Wilcox wrote:
mod_perl is a security nightmare in a shared environment which is why you
will need to go the dedicated route.
I haven't had a need for mod_perl in a shared hosting environment, but
before recommending my favorite shared hosting provider that I use with
clients, I figured
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:15:53AM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
I've often wondered if this greater power in mod_perl has been a
hindrance rather than a help to the Perl web development community.
Would we have been better off if, in addition to mod_perl (for the rare
cases when you do need
: Re: [Boston.pm] Affordable web hosting service that offers
mod_perl?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:15:53AM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
I've often wondered if this greater power in mod_perl has been a
hindrance rather than a help to the Perl web development community.
Would we have been better off
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:00:13PM -0400, Christopher Morgan wrote:
What alternatives to mod_perl would speed up running cgi scripts but not
require a dedicated server?
In many cases - not coding like a dumb bastard :-)
--
David Cantrell | Benevolent Dictator Of The World
Good advice
On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Christopher Morgan wrote:
What alternatives to mod_perl would speed up running cgi scripts
but not
require a dedicated server?
Off the top of my head there's fastcgi (popular w/ the rails/lighttpd
folks), speedycgi, and pperl. [I'm not sure if pperl can be
] Affordable web hosting service that offers
mod_perl?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:00:13PM -0400, Christopher Morgan wrote:
What alternatives to mod_perl would speed up running cgi scripts but
not require a dedicated server?
In many cases - not coding like a dumb bastard :-)
--
David Cantrell
CM == Christopher Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CM David,
CM The ADB (Association for Dumb Bastards) is going to hear about this!(:-)
i bet you joined as a member and are now the president! :)
actually the US prez is also a member!
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DT == Drew Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DT On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Christopher Morgan wrote:
What alternatives to mod_perl would speed up running cgi scripts
but not
require a dedicated server?
DT Off the top of my head there's fastcgi (popular w/ the rails/lighttpd
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Tom Metro wrote:
I've often wondered if this greater power in mod_perl has been a
hindrance rather than a help to the Perl web development community.
Would we have been better off if, in addition to mod_perl (for the
rare
cases when you do need low-level
14 matches
Mail list logo
