Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-15 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:24:51 + (GMT), Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Ben Tilly wrote: I've also been told that Module::Build doesn't do a good job for people who want to install a module into a personal directory - it tries to install it into the system

Re: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Uri Guttman
BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT My recollection says that Debian likes to place the BT modules that it installs in /usr/lib while the ones BT that you install go into /usr/local/lib. Guess which BT one is first on Perl's library path? BT This can cause problems when

Re: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ben Tilly
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:39:21 -0500, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BT == Ben Tilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BT My recollection says that Debian likes to place the BT modules that it installs in /usr/lib while the ones BT that you install go into /usr/local/lib. Guess which

Re: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Larry Underhill
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 03:39 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: i think another solution would be to just rip out debian's /usr/lib/perl5 and /usr/bin/perl and install perl from source using /usr/local/lib. then all cpan modules will be properly installed there and perl will be in /usr/local/bin. also

Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ricker, William
I did some research on CPAN v Debian recently since I want to try Maypole on a Debian system. (Not at work -- my research project is on Debian on Alpha 20264, 64-bit Perl, whee) PerlMonks has an article on the hazards of breaking the Perl that Debian itself relies upon for it's package management

Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Simon Wilcox
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Ricker, William wrote: There is a tool to make CPAN and Debian play nicely, dh-make-Perl. Except be aware that it doesn't support Module::Build so any modules that have switched over to M::B won't build properly, iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. I gave

RE: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ricker, William
doesn't support Module::Build so any modules Ouch iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. Double ouch. Maybe it needs a patch. Thanks for the warning, that may put me off adopting Module::Build. Bill ___ Boston-pm mailing list

Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ben Tilly
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:37:03 -0500, Ricker, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doesn't support Module::Build so any modules Ouch iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. Double ouch. Maybe it needs a patch. Thanks for the warning, that may put me off adopting Module::Build.

Re: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-13 Thread Ben Tilly
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:38:23 -0500, Joel Gwynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your response. See below [...] 6. what has changed since that installation? I can't think of anything. I may have upgraded something using apt-get My recollection says that Debian likes to place the modules

[Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-12 Thread Joel Gwynn
I've got a perl 5.6.1 installation on debian 2.4.23 that seems to fail many many tests when I try to install packages. The current packages I'm trying to install are Geo::Code::US and Bundle::CPAN. Both are failing all kinds of tests, an I'm not sure where to start troubleshooting. What's the

RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-12 Thread Ivan Chang
according to CPAN) and Bundle::CPAN (looks okay)? 8. do you have all the prerequisites already installed for these two modules? Ivan From: Joel Gwynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Joel Gwynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: boston-pm@mail.pm.org Subject: [Boston.pm] Install problems Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:24:55