On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:32:51PM -0400, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
Obligatory perl comment - TIMTOWTDI, and sometimes, a good way,
regards both clarity and speed, is having perl read a BNF and write a
parser in prolog, which does the parsing, and writes an AST in perl,
which
Obligatory perl comment - TIMTOWTDI, and sometimes, a good way,
regards both clarity and speed, is having perl read a BNF and write a
parser in prolog, which does the parsing, and writes an AST in perl,
which is then eval()ed. Really.
Take multiple non-identical shots
Or Nearly identical
Apply computes.
This is what amateur photo-astronomers (and much of professional) do today.
The image-of-the-day at Major News aoubt Minor Objects is almost always a
stack.
http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/news.htm
(Friday is an
the resolution you
can get from 35mm film the least it can do is run my scripts!
- Original Message -
From: Mark J. Dulcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: Cameras Re: [Boston.pm] Tech/Social Meeting w/ Randal Schwartz
Chris
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
William == William Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Randal's 8MP Canon is *so* Yesterday.
Well, 8MP at $1500 is *so* Today and tomorrow. :)
Megapixels shmegapixels.
Is the lens any good?
It's this one, right?
Chris Devers wrote:
Megapixels shmegapixels.
Is the lens any good?
It's this one, right?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001G6U5C
It looks like just annother fancy point shoot (albeit one that takes
images of unweildy size).
Maybe next time you can get a nice SLR instead...
Megapixels shmegapixels.
Is the lens any good?
Yes, theres no point in recording higher fidelity than the glass will support. Which
is why I disagred with someone who thought in 10 years the consumer digital cameras
will be better than old silver pro caners. Mass production economies haven't
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, William Ricker wrote:
no, both Randall's new almost affordable toy and the item I linked are
DSLRs with classic glass.
Oh, ok, I stand corrected.
I didn't notice a link or a model name for the one he has now, so I put
Canon 8mp digital camera into Google and got back a
Chris == Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, 8MP at $1500 is *so* Today and tomorrow. :)
Chris Megapixels shmegapixels.
Chris Is the lens any good?
Chris It's this one, right?
Chris http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001G6U5C
Chris It looks like just annother
Randal's 8MP Canon is *so* Yesterday.
Canon's new 16.7MP Digital SLR, with WiFi
LoudMusic writes Canon has recently announced the EOS 1Ds Mark II, successor to
their previous excellent professional cameras. What makes this one so cool is that it
can network. The early review over at
Uri == Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RJK == Ronald J Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RJK Randal Schwartz -- author, trainer, Just Another Perl Hacker --
RJK will be speaking to us on topics of his choosing, possibly
RJK including fighting spam, mod_perl, objects, and/or Test::More.
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 09:54, Ian Langworth wrote:
My votes, in order,
1. Web-testing
2. Spamfighting
Though, Randal, I would love to pick your brane about testing,
teaching writing about Perl :-)
Aye! I'm trying to get up the nerve to write an article on the WD repeat
protein
Boston.pm will have a tech meeting Wednesday, September 22, at Akamai,
8 Cambridge Center, second floor, starting at 7pm.
Randal Schwartz -- author, trainer, Just Another Perl Hacker -- will be
speaking to us on topics of his choosing, possibly including fighting spam,
mod_perl, objects, and/or
Uri Guttman wrote:
RJK == Ronald J Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RJK Randal Schwartz -- author, trainer, Just Another Perl Hacker --
RJK will be speaking to us on topics of his choosing, possibly
RJK including fighting spam, mod_perl, objects, and/or Test::More.
and i have just been
From: Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:10:28 -0400
another possibility is to have two talks. randal said these talks can
run from 45-90 minutes. so we start at 7, get 2 shortish talks and then
adjourn to the CBC by 9pm.
I'd like to hear web testing,
15 matches
Mail list logo
