On Dec 5, 2004, at 2:26 PM, Gyepi SAM wrote:
The main disadvantage I have found is that you cannot run commands
which
require real root privileges. For instance: iptables does not work and
init
is really a fake init which cannot be controlled.
Thank you for pointing that out. I assumed that I
Andrew Langmead wrote:
On Dec 5, 2004, at 2:26 PM, Gyepi SAM wrote:
The main disadvantage I have found is that you cannot run commands which
require real root privileges. For instance: iptables does not work and
init
is really a fake init which cannot be controlled.
Thank you for pointing that
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:55:40AM -0500, Andrew Langmead wrote:
On Dec 5, 2004, at 2:26 PM, Gyepi SAM wrote:
The main disadvantage I have found is that you cannot run commands
which
require real root privileges. For instance: iptables does not work and
init
is really a fake init which
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 01:11:00AM -0500, Andrew Langmead wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with any companies providing Virtual Private
Server (also
called Virtual Dedicated Hosting)?
After years of using shared hosting services, I switched about a year ago to a
UML based VPS with
Gyepi SAM wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 01:11:00AM -0500, Andrew Langmead wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with any companies providing Virtual Private Server (also
called Virtual Dedicated Hosting)?
The main disadvantage I have found is that you cannot run commands which
require real
While we're on the topic, this lurker would like to know if there is
anything better for running multiple websites than a BHCOM.com virtual
server (I pay $59 per month for the virtual server, and $25 per month
to be able to host up to 25 domain names (total $84). All of my
websites have the
