Uri Guttman wrote:
well, if you solve the halting problem you could solve this too. :)
I think this would make an excellent student project.
--
David Cantrell | Benevolent Dictator Of The World
What is the difference between hearing aliens through the
fillings in your teeth and hearing Jesus
DC == David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DC Uri Guttman wrote:
well, if you solve the halting problem you could solve this too. :)
DC I think this would make an excellent student project.
for the endless summer of code?
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JW == Jun Wan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JW Is there a way to do the sementic checking on subtroutines? I want
JW to make sure the the subroutine called is defined somewhere
JW (either from an imported module, or system builtin). I know 'use
JW strict' can prevent you from using a
Dear Uri,
[...] subs can come into existance any time and be
handled by AUTOLOAD and such. so there is no easy compile time way to
check that at the moment. [...]
A sub can, of course, be defined at run-time and then used. But this
is not the point.
It is the same principle as for any other
On 7/18/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KS == Kripa Sundar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KS Dear Uri,
[...] subs can come into existance any time and be
handled by AUTOLOAD and such. so there is no easy compile time way to
check that at the moment. [...]
KS It is the
