Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-15 Thread Ben Tilly
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:24:51 + (GMT), Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Ben Tilly wrote: I've also been told that Module::Build doesn't do a good job for people who want to install a module into a personal directory - it tries to install it into the system

Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ricker, William
I did some research on CPAN v Debian recently since I want to try Maypole on a Debian system. (Not at work -- my research project is on Debian on Alpha 20264, 64-bit Perl, whee) PerlMonks has an article on the hazards of breaking the Perl that Debian itself relies upon for it's package management

Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Simon Wilcox
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Ricker, William wrote: There is a tool to make CPAN and Debian play nicely, dh-make-Perl. Except be aware that it doesn't support Module::Build so any modules that have switched over to M::B won't build properly, iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. I gave

RE: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ricker, William
doesn't support Module::Build so any modules Ouch iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. Double ouch. Maybe it needs a patch. Thanks for the warning, that may put me off adopting Module::Build. Bill ___ Boston-pm mailing list

Re: Debian v CPAN RE: [Boston.pm] Install problems

2005-02-14 Thread Ben Tilly
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:37:03 -0500, Ricker, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doesn't support Module::Build so any modules Ouch iirc even if they have a compatibility Makefile.PL. Double ouch. Maybe it needs a patch. Thanks for the warning, that may put me off adopting Module::Build.