[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
*>> Well, but I'd bet you could recite word-for-word
*>> the entire 1-3 seasons of Buffy by rote :)
*>
*>Nope, sorry. as a general rule, I don't watch TV,
*>except maybe to hang out with my wife,
*>or to watch the
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 08:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or the opening line of "The old man and the Sea"
by Hemingway (pound for pound, my favorite)
Mine be the one that includeth the line,
"Tu-whit, tu-who! a merry note. While greasy Joan doth keel the pot."
Not quite sure why.
Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Well, but I'd bet you could recite word-for-word
> the entire 1-3 seasons of Buffy by rote :)
Nope, sorry. as a general rule, I don't watch TV,
except maybe to hang out with my wife,
or to watch the history/discovery channel.
As far as recitation, I could do
"For
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
>
> *>Greg "You misunderestimate me" London
>
> Never :) Semper ubi sub ubi!
Amazon willing, we all will:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/188491
And search for "clean" :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>> "Et tu, Brute". It's vocative case, dammit!
*>>
*>> Geez, screwing up Latin AND Shakespeare in one short phrase. Don't
*>> they teach you kids across the pond ANYTHING these days? :)
*>
*>Yeah, efficiency. two screw ups in just three words is
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Walt Mankowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:23:42PM -0500, Matthew Brooks wrote:
> > So as you can see, he didn't say he knew "Et tu, Brute" ;)
>
> True, but I still feel like I should be holding a Roman short sword to
> his throat until he gets it right. :)
Walt Mankowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:33:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Greg "Et tu, Brutus" London
>
> "Et tu, Brute". It's vocative case, dammit!
>
> Geez, screwing up Latin AND Shakespeare in one short phrase. Don't
> they teach you kids across the pond ANYTHING
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:23:42PM -0500, Matthew Brooks wrote:
> So as you can see, he didn't say he knew "Et tu, Brute" ;)
True, but I still feel like I should be holding a Roman short sword to
his throat until he gets it right. :)
Walt
msg00398/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
To Greg's credit, he did say that...
qq~
This is the extent of the Latin I know:
Quid pro quo, Mr. Powers, quid pro quo.
E Pluribus Unum
Semper Fi(delis)
Romanes Eunt Domus (OK, I had to look that one up)
~;
So as you can see, he didn't say he knew "Et tu, Brute" ;)
Matthew "4 years of Latin
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tolkin, Steve wrote:
> If I recall correctly, Olive Oyl, in some old Popeye cartoon,
> says it to the Brutus character in the definitive American way:
> Et tu, you brute
Yes yes :), but the real question -- which I guess we're not going
to find out now -- is *what happens if
If I recall correctly, Olive Oyl, in some old Popeye cartoon,
says it to the Brutus character in the definitive American way:
Et tu, you brute
Hopefully helpfully yours,
Steve
--
Steven Tolkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 617-563-0516
Fidelity Investments 82 Devonshire St. V8D Boston
At 02:30 PM 1/13/03 -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote:
Geez, screwing up Latin AND Shakespeare in one short phrase. Don't
they teach you kids across the pond ANYTHING these days? :)
Never underestimate the power of public education in the US. :-)
Drew
--
Drew Taylor| Web
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:33:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greg "Et tu, Brutus" London
"Et tu, Brute". It's vocative case, dammit!
Geez, screwing up Latin AND Shakespeare in one short phrase. Don't
they teach you kids across the pond ANYTHING these days? :)
msg00393/pgp0.pgp
Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>
> Chris Devers [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
> *>
> *>So it's unanimous then? Perligata it is?
> *>
> *>Oh well, de gustibus non est disputandum.
>
> Quod erat demonstrandum :)
>
> Well, yankees have trouble enough speaking English so expecting those who
> didn't have
Chris Devers [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>So it's unanimous then? Perligata it is?
*>
*>Oh well, de gustibus non est disputandum.
Quod erat demonstrandum :)
Well, yankees have trouble enough speaking English so expecting those who
didn't have a nun beating Latin into them for 8-years to be
well, with a burst of early voting (and no obvious ballot stuffing), we
can declare a winner with 84% of the vote (8 total votes with margin of
error is +/- 274%), and it is life, the universe and everything. unless
a large number of dead perl mongers vote from the grave, that is the
talk damian
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 01:15, Uri Guttman wrote:
> also the topic o his talk needs to be selected. he suggested either
> perligata (perl in latin) or life, the universe and everything. neither
> has been presented to boston.pm before.
>
life, the universe and everything
Key server:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Boger wrote:
>
> =>Quoting Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> =>
> =>> we had one vote each for the above two talks. so vote for your favorite
> =>> by emailing to the list. you can also pick other topics from his list.
> =>
>
I vote for life, the universe, and everything
-mike
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:15:53AM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> damian is scheduled to give a talk to us on tuesday jan. 21. we need to
> hear from boston.com that the meeting is ok that night and from ronald
> to use his fearless leader
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we had one vote each for the above two talks. so vote for your favorite
> by emailing to the list. you can also pick other topics from his list.
Add my vote for "life, the universe and everything".
--
Steve Reppucci
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:30:31AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
> My vote was -- and is -- for Perligata, and Walt more or less agreed. I
> haven't seen any other on-list votes either way. Did I miss something?
I've seen both talks, and they're both great. But since I won't be
attending the talk
I also vote for Life, the Universe, and everything.
Stefan Dragnev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
Boston-pm mailing
I vote for Life, the Universe, and everything.
___
Boston-pm mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Boger wrote:
=>Quoting Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
=>
=>> we had one vote each for the above two talks. so vote for your favorite
=>> by emailing to the list. you can also pick other topics from his list.
=>
=>being afraid of Latin, I'd vote for "life, the universe
Quoting Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> we had one vote each for the above two talks. so vote for your favorite
> by emailing to the list. you can also pick other topics from his list.
being afraid of Latin, I'd vote for "life, the universe and everything". Or,
any of the perl 6 talks :)
I vote for Life, the Universe, and everything.
Nova Software -- Networking Software and Consulting
-- Original Message ---
From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:15:53 -0500
Life, the Universe and Everything...
Uri Guttman wrote:
damian is scheduled to give a talk to us on tuesday jan. 21. we need to
hear from boston.com that the meeting is ok that night and from ronald
to use his fearless leader powers to announce it.
also the topic o his talk needs to be
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Uri Guttman wrote:
> damian is scheduled to give a talk to us on tuesday jan. 21. we need to
> hear from boston.com that the meeting is ok that night and from ronald
> to use his fearless leader powers to announce it.
Plans are being made. News when it's newsworthy.
> also
28 matches
Mail list logo
