Thanks. Good stuff.
--Alex
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Muhlich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Setting cookies in different browsers
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:53, Alex Brelsfoard wrote:
> I am most
> "AS" == Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AS> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:35, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> the symbol table is just a special hash tree with
>> global side effects. so why not just use a regular hash as it is safer
>> (no global side issues), more flexible (you can
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:35, Uri Guttman wrote:
> the symbol table is just a special hash tree with
> global side effects. so why not just use a regular hash as it is safer
> (no global side issues), more flexible (you can pass it around, take
> references, create anonymous hashes) and you can
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:32:40AM -0700, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
> Thanks for the responses. I did use "my" to declare the variables -
> removing that allowed me to reference the variables correctly.
You almost certainly don't want to do what you were trying to do though.
A hash would be the
AB> I am not using CGI to handle the information coming in from forms. It's a
AB> long story, but believe me, it works out better this way.
URI> i don't believe you. show us proof. 99% of home rolled cgi solutions
URI> have bugs and security holes. are you part of the 1% who knows all the
> "AB" == Alex Brelsfoard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AB> I am not using CGI to handle the information coming in from forms. It's a
AB> long story, but believe me, it works out better this way.
i don't believe you. show us proof. 99% of home rolled cgi solutions
have bugs and security
> "PN" == Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PN> Thanks for the responses. I did use "my" to declare the variables -
PN> removing that allowed me to reference the variables correctly.
and no one warned you about the evils of doing that. read this:
Thanks for the responses. I did use "my" to declare the variables -
removing that allowed me to reference the variables correctly.
-Nilanjan
PS: Apologies for the multiple posts. I post rather infrequently and the
time before this, I had had a lot of problems (which I found out later
was due to
Y'all are quick on the send button. To repeat...
I thought this is possible, but maybe I'm wrong. Ok, here's the issue:
I want to print the values of a bunch of variables so I thought I'll
take a shortcut and do this:
foreach (qw(var1 var2 var3 var4))
{
print "$_ -> ${$_}\n";
}
I had
You can also try:
foreach (qw(var1 var2 var3 var4))
{
eval ('print "'.$_.' -> $'.$_.'\n"');
}
Either way works.
Tal Cohen
PS
>... but it printed nothing.
Did you assign a value to $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:11:22AM -0700, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
> I want to print the values of a bunch of variables so I thought I'll
> take a shortcut and do this:
>
> foreach (qw(var1 var2 var3 var4))
> {
> print "$_ -> ${$_}\n";
> }
>
> I had thought that interpolating the variable
On 1 Sep 2004, at 11:11 AM, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
I thought this is possible, but maybe I'm wrong. Ok, here's the issue:
I want to print the values of a bunch of variables so I thought I'll
take a shortcut and do this:
foreach (qw(var1 var2 var3 var4))
{
print "$_ -> ${$_}\n";
}
I had
I thought this is possible, but maybe I'm wrong. Ok, here's the issue:
I want to print the values of a bunch of variables so I thought I'll
take a shortcut and do this:
foreach (qw(var1 var2 var3 var4))
{
print "$_ -> ${$_}\n";
}
I had thought that interpolating the variable name
13 matches
Mail list logo
