I think the current policy is fine as is.
Location is just one of many factors to be discussed before applying
for, or accepting, a job. If this is a pressing concern the applicant
should ask about it in an early phone call. Other people will care more
about salary, benefits, the nature of the
>Clarification: the monger had not actually talked to the recruiter in this
>case, but was recalling past situations where this had happened. We
>don't actually know how far away this particular job is from a commuter
>rail station. Sorry about the confusion.
>
>Ronald
I know the recruiter who p
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:20:26AM -0500, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> I received an off-list comment from a Perl monger, in response to the
> recent job posting for a Senior Perl Developer in Waltham, MA. The monger
> had spent some time talking with the recruiter, only to learn that the
> location
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:20:26AM -0500, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> I thought of an alternate suggestion, which is that job postings
> without a street address must indicate accessibility to mass transit.
I think this would make sense. Just saying if it's metro/commuter rail
accessible should be
I received an off-list comment from a Perl monger, in response to the
recent job posting for a Senior Perl Developer in Waltham, MA. The monger
had spent some time talking with the recruiter, only to learn that the
location was too far from a commuter rail station to be worthwhile. The
monger sug
5 matches
Mail list logo
