Guillermo Roditi wrote:
> Please take a look at Class::MOP and Class::MOP::Class. Sounds like a little
> ->meta foo would makeyour life easier... Introspection is good and good for
> you!
> http://search.cpan.org/~stevan/Class-MOP-0.37/
Indeed. It even includes one of the things I was looking for
On 5/18/07, Greg London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> >You're looking at the wrong part of the code. I'm referring to how I
> >made sure to capture refaddr before creating the anonymous sub so that
> >the anonymous sub did not have $object in it anywhere. That keeps
> >$object from being in
>The purpose of using goto there is in case some code uses caller() and
>could get confused about the extra subroutine. (For instance Carp
>would be likely to warn at the enclosing subroutine that you defined.)
Ah yes, it's coming back to me now
___
>On 5/18/07, Greg London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >sub replace_sub_for_instance {
>> >my ($object, $subroutine_name, $new_subroutine) = @_;
>> >no strict 'refs';
>> >my $old_subroutine = \&$subroutine_name
>> >or die "Subroutine $subroutine_name not found";
>> >my $
> "TM" == Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> Isn't there also a potential problem if the if something upstream of the
TM> reblessing saves a reference to the object, or is this true:
TM>use Scalar::Util 'refaddr';
TM>my $obj = {};
TM>my $before = refaddr($obj);
On 5/18/07, Greg London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >sub replace_sub_for_instance {
> >my ($object, $subroutine_name, $new_subroutine) = @_;
> >no strict 'refs';
> >my $old_subroutine = \&$subroutine_name
> >or die "Subroutine $subroutine_name not found";
> >my $object_n
>sub replace_sub_for_instance {
>my ($object, $subroutine_name, $new_subroutine) = @_;
>no strict 'refs';
>my $old_subroutine = \&$subroutine_name
>or die "Subroutine $subroutine_name not found";
>my $object_name = refaddr($object);
>*$subroutine_name = sub {
>m
>On first read of Greg's code I thought he was suggesting modifying the
>class under test to incorporate the extra decision logic, but taking a
>second look after seeing your take above, I see the idea was to
>externally inject a wrapper with instance detection logic. This could be
>a good approach
On 5/18/07, Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Tilly wrote:
[...]
> > Also note that AUTOLOAD and inheritance do NOT play well together.
> > That's another reason to avoid that solution.
>
> I had that thought as well. Isn't there a workaround where your AUTOLOAD
> handler can explicitly ha
Ben Tilly wrote:
> sub replace_sub_for_instance {
> my ($object, $subroutine_name, $new_subroutine) = @_;
> no strict 'refs';
> my $old_subroutine = \&$subroutine_name
> or die "Subroutine $subroutine_name not found";
> my $object_name = refaddr($object);
> *$subroutine_
> "TM" == Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> My understanding is that Perl's OO dereferencing for methods doesn't
TM> involve the object instance, other than to obtain the class name so it
TM> can find the right package namespace. If this is correct, then there
TM> probably i
http://search.cpan.org/~stevan/Class-MOP-0.37/
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillermo Roditi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 18, 2007 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] overriding instance methods, dynamic package
namespaces
To: Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please take a look at Cl
On 5/17/07, Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg London wrote:
> > Evals and typeglobs will let you do it.
> > If you don't like that sort of thing (I don't),
> > you can use a module I wrote called SymbolTable
> > which hides all the ugliness for you.
>
> Thanks Greg for taking the time to
13 matches
Mail list logo
