[Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
Hey all, I know this is not so much a JavaScript group, but I figured someone might have heard of what I am running into. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Situation: I am using JavaScript to create an image. It needs to be loaded, and i need to see its request in the apache logs. Proble

Re: [Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread Tom Metro
Alex Brelsfoard wrote: > ...an imageneeds to be loaded, and i need to see its request in > the apache logs. > > ...on IE7 on Windows (the image loads and exists in the temporary > internet files folder, but there is no request for the image in the > apache logs). What you've described is phys

Re: [Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread Ben Tilly
On 11/12/07, Alex Brelsfoard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I know this is not so much a JavaScript group, but I figured someone > might have heard of what I am running into. > If not, feel free to ignore this message. > > Situation: > I am using JavaScript to create an image. > It needs

Re: [Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread Alex Brelsfoard
Thanks guys, But sadly I've actually already been down this road. Part of the img src does include a large random number. On top of that I have also checked the temporary internet folder and I see multiple copies (with different random numbers) of the same image there. I have run this test with a

Re: [Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread john saylor
hey not really perl but wothehell ... On 11/12/07, Alex Brelsfoard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have run this test with a cleared cache, and with previous copies in cache. > the results do not vary. have you set the no cache headers for the image download? [on the server side] also, in your e

Re: [Boston.pm] IE7 and JS image object

2007-11-12 Thread Tom Metro
Alex Brelsfoard wrote: > Part of the img src does include a large random number. > On top of that I have also checked the temporary internet folder and I > see multiple copies (with different random numbers) of the same image > there. That would suggest it is working. At least from the browser's p